Thanks to Bernard Lavallée for sending me a copy of his book, Sauver la Planète une Bouchée à la Fois: Trucs et Conseils (Translation: Save the Planet One Bite at a Time : Tips and Advice), Les Éditions La Presse, 2015.
It’s a beautifully designed and illustrated book about food and food systems—with recipes—meant for French-speaking Canadians, but it’s lovely to have even if you can’t read French well (which I cannot).
Today is the day your taxes are due (in case you hadn’t noticed) and I’ve been collecting items on how tax dollars are used to subsidize businesses that rely on low-wage workers.
1. Fight for $15 is mobilizing fast-food and other low-wage workers to walk off their jobs today in what the group says is the most widespread mobilization ever by U.S. workers seeking higher pay. It expects protests in “more than 100 cities, in 35 countries, on six continents, from Sao Paolo to Tokyo.” USA Today has the story on it.
2. The New York Times featured people who are working, but still need public assistance to get buy (and they qualify for it).
Yet these same people also are on public assistance — relying on food stamps, Medicaid or other stretches of the safety net to help cover basic expenses when their paychecks come up short.
And they are not alone. Nearly three-quarters of the people helped by programs geared to the poor are members of a family headed by a worker, according to a new study by the Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education at the University of California. As a result, taxpayers are providing not only support to the poor but also, in effect, a huge subsidy for employers of low-wage workers, from giants like McDonald’s and Walmart to mom-and-pop businesses.
Families in which at least one member is working now make up the vast majority of those enrolled in major public-assistance programs like Medicaid and food stamps, according to a new study. It’s a “hidden cost” of low-wage work, researchers say, and it costs taxpayers about $153 billion a year.
4. The Restaurant Opportunities Center (ROC) just released a report, Picking up the NRA’s Tab: The Public Cost of Low Wages in the Restaurant Industry.
The report’s key findings:
ROC United is spearheading ‘One Fair Wage,’ a multi-state and national campaign to raise the lower, tipped minimum wage–currently $2.13 per hour–to 100% of the regular minimum wage.
Now, how about setting the minimum wage at $15 per hour….
I’ve been collecting items on sugars. Here are the first two. Two more will come later this week.
1. The American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Nutrition has new guidance on sugars in schools.
Although access to junk foods remains an issue in schools, the Council blames the problem on students, parents, and staff. It advises:
A positive emphasis on nutritional value, variety,appropriate portion, and encouragement for a steady improvement in quality will be a more effective approach for improving nutrition and health than simply advocating for the elimination of added sugars.
Really? Evidence, please.
I ask because Kellogg could not be happier with this approach. A little sugar, it says, may help kids eat more nutritious foods.
Surely it’s not a coincidence that one of the authors discloses receiving support from the National Dairy Council and the American Dairy Association, and the other receives support from the Nestle Nutrition Institute.
In any case, we aren’t talking about a little sugar in schools. We are talking about candy, cupcakes, and drinks brought in for birthdays, treats, and after school celebrations.
2. Sugar in the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)
This, you will of course recall, is the controversial multinational trade agreement currently under negotiation (see my previous post on this topic).
Japan wants to keep its tariff on sugar.
It now appears that the Japanese sugar industry gave a 1 million yen donation to a political group that supports Minister of Agriculture Koya Nishikawa, just before he became involved in the TPP talks in 2013.
As one commentator put it, considering Nishikawa’s central role in the TPP negotiations,
his receipt of a donation from an industry group brings his morals as a politician into question. Nishikawa stated that he returned the donation in light of his capacity as agricultural minister, but this is unlikely to resolve the situation…In March 2013, it was announced that the Japan Sugar Refiners’ Association would receive 1.3 billion yen in subsidies under a Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries’ project.
At the very least, this situation looks like blatant conflict of interest.
Everyone I speak to in Washington, DC says the same thing: if you want policies to change in favor of healthy food systems, you must contact members of Congress and say what you think they should do. If they get comments on issues, they listen. If they don’t, nothing will change.
It’s not hard to send an e-mail or telephone your representatives.
Thanks to Jerry Hagstrom, who writes the invaluable Hagstrom Report, for producing instant guides and contact information to members of the Senate and House agriculture committees.
As for the contentious 2015 Dietary Guidelines: the comment period has been extended to May 8. The agencies make it easy to file comments. Do it here.
The comments don’t need to be long or complicated. Just indicate identify yourself, state the topic you are concerned about, say what you’d like the guidelines to say, and if possible add a reference or two.
Do this and you will be encouraging the agencies to do the right thing.
If you don’t, who will?
Addition, April 14: Here’s a video explanation of how to file comments on the dietary guidelines.
The fabulous Bryant Terry has produced a terrific book on an unexpected topic. Who knew that classic African diaspora cooking—collards, grits, okra, and the like—could be just as delicious and just as culturally meaningful without including ingredients of animal origin.
In this book, he gives the also fabulous Jessica Harris “Permission to Speak,” which is what her Foreword is titled. Bryant, she says, “amply and ably demonstrates that he knows that food and culture are inseparable and that history is always there on the plate.”
This is a serious work of culinary skill. Bryant doesn’t make a big deal of his veganism. He just shows how to cook traditional foods, really well.
Prediction: This book will win prizes.
A coalition of children’s and consumer advocacy groups (see list below) filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charging that Google’s new YouTube Kids app violates restrictions on marketing junk foods to kids.
The coalition’s letter to the FTC details the charges. YouTube Kids, it says:
On the American Greetings’ Strawberry Shortcake channel, for instance, a 37-second video features the red-haired doll describing the company’s “Food Fair” app, where characters pick ingredients for recipes. At the end, a banner appears showing the app can be downloaded on iTunes. McDonald’s has a 7-minute video dispelling myths about the contents of Chicken McNuggets. On another video, a deep-voiced announcer warns, “All vegetarians, foodies and gastronauts, kindly avert your eyes,” with a slow-cam close up of a juicy Big Mac. “You can’t get juiciness like this from soy or quinoa.”
Here’s the Coalition list: the Center for Digital Democracy, Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center for Science in the Public Interest, Children Now, Consumer Federation of America, Consumer Watchdog, Corporate Accountability International, and Public Citizen.
This will be fun to watch. Stay tuned.
Today’s New York Times has a front-page story about how the FDA knew that certain weight-loss supplements contained unlabeled amphetamine-like substances but did nothing about it, perhaps because its head supplement official came from the industry (and has since returned to it).
Let’s start with the science.
In 2014, Pieter Cohen and his colleagues noted that several athletes had been disqualified from competition after tests found evidence of a methamphetamine analog (N,α-diethyl-phenylethylamine) in their urine. The athletes said that the chemical must have come from their workout supplements. Cohen et al. tested the supplements and identified the analog as one with entirely untested stimulant, addictive, or other adverse effects in humans. They recommended its immediate removal from all dietary supplements.
Earlier that year, the FDA reported that 9 of 21 supplements containing Acacia rigidula to test positive for varying amounts of another methamphetamine analog, β-Methylphenethylamine (BMPEA). The FDA investigators said this compound could be misidentified as amphetamine during certain kinds of analyses, but did not identify the products found to contain BMPEA.
Cohen et al. then did their own tests of the kinds of supplements the FDA had tested.
The stimulant was present at quantities such that consumers following recommended maximum daily servings could consume a maximum of 93.7 mg of BMPEA per day. Consumers of Acacia rigidula supplements may be exposed to pharmacological dosages of an amphetamine isomer that lacks evidence of safety in humans. The FDA should immediately warn consumers about BMPEA and take aggressive enforcement action to eliminate BMPEA in dietary supplements.
The New York Times explains the context:
The controversy comes at a time when the supplement industry is under increased scrutiny. Last week, 14 state attorneys general, led by Eric T. Schneiderman of New York, called on Congress to provide the F.D.A. with more power to regulate supplements. Mr. Schneiderman’s office in February accused four major retailers of selling contaminated herbal supplements, and one of the companies, GNC, has agreed to extensive new testing and quality control procedures for its store-brand herbal products.
This brings us to the politics.
The supplement industry, of course, is doing everything it can to oppose and stop Schneiderman’s work.
Recall that Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act in 1994, essentially deregulating the industry. The act allowed absurd health claims for supplements and essentially removed much of the FDA’s authority to regulate these products.
As for conflicts of interest at FDA:
Since DSHEA, the dietary supplement industry has gotten a pass. Suggestions:
I am increasingly concerned about the proliferation of research studies sponsored and funded by food, beverage, or supplement companies with a vested interested in the outcome. These almost invariably come to conclusions in favor of the sponsor’s food product.
You must understand that I am not searching for sponsored studies in any systematic way. They just appear in the tables of contents of journals I typically read and are easily identified by their titles.
My plan is to post a list of sponsored research studies every time I accumulate 5 examples. My first post in this series appeared March 16.
1. Purified palmitoleic acid for the reduction of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and serum lipids: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo controlled study, by Adam M. Bernstein, MD, ScD, Michael F. Roizen, MD, Luis Martinez, MD, MPH. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2014;8:612–617.
2. Whey Protein Supplementation Preserves Postprandial Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis during Short-Term Energy Restriction in Overweight and Obese Adults, by Amy J Hector, George R Marcotte, Tyler A Churchward-Venne, Caoileann H Murphy, Leigh Breen,Mark von Allmen, Steven K Baker, and Stuart M Phillips. J Nutrition 2015;145:246–52.
3. Natural cocoa consumption: Potential to reduce atherogenic factors? By Brian K. McFarlin, Adam S. Venable, Andrea L. Henning, Eric A. Prado, Jill N. Best Sampson, Jakob L. Vingren, David W. Hill. J Nutritional Biochemistry 2015: in press.
4. The effect of a high-egg diet on cardiovascular risk factors in people with type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes and Egg (DIABEGG) study—a 3-mo randomized controlled trial, by Nicholas R Fuller, Ian D Caterson, Amanda Sainsbury, Gareth Denyer, Mackenzie Fong, James Gerofi, Katherine Baqleh, Kathryn H Williams, Namson S Lau, and Tania P Markovic. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 101:705-713.
5. Dietary Flaxseed Independently Lowers Circulating Cholesterol and Lowers It beyond the Effects of Cholesterol-Lowering Medications Alone in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease. Andrea L Edel, Delfin Rodriguez-Leyva, Thane G Maddaford, Stephanie PB Caligiuri, J Alejandro Austria, Wendy Weighell, Randolph Guzman, Michel Aliani, and Grant N Pierce. J. Nutr. 2015; 145:749-757.
I was surprised by FoodNavigator-USA’s story about “SmartCandy,”—a “vitamin-infused snack.”
Could the name and contents of this candy be violating the FDA’s “jelly bean” rule?
The “jelly bean” rule refers to FDA’s fortification policy,* which aims to discourage food and beverage makers from adding vitamins to “foods of minimal nutritional value” (a.k.a. junk foods) so they can be marketed as healthy.
The policy is explicit. The FDA does not consider it appropriate to add nutrients to candies and beverages.
Here’s what the article says about what’s in it:
Smartcandy is formulated with a blend of Vitamin A for eye health, three B vitamins to support converting sugar and carbohydrates into sustained energy, and vitamin C for immunity. The trans fat-, high-fructose corn syrup-free candies come in four varieties: sweet and sour gummies; and Froot, a proprietary snack with a candy shell and a layer of yogurt encasing a strawberry or orange center.
Here’s the Nutrition Facts label (thanks to a reader for sending).
Here’s what the website says Orange Froot candy can do:
This is the visionary leader of the snacking world, it’s the one they listen to and admire. He can make a three point shot with his eyes closed, build the best fort you’ve ever seen, or solve an algebra question like it was a nursery rhyme, this flavor packed snack will push you to achieve anything!
If SmartCandy can get away with this, won’t Coca-Cola and Pepsi be next?
Candy is candy and has an place in kids’s diets—occasionally. But a health food that makes kids do better in school? I’d like to see the evidence for that.
FDA: take a look please.
*Thanks to Michael Jacobson for forwarding.
Update, April 13: The New York State Attorney General has filed a complaint.